HASN'T THE BIG BANG HAPPEN ALREADY ? I WONDER

the big bang hasn't happen so whats the rush?

THE BIG UNIVERSE probability

by: rod kawecki 2015.02.06

some say he's a u.f.t. candidate he's gotta new force on the blink

Bubble or Balloons

      We look at the birth of the universe as an explosion which usually means the end of things but when it comes to the universe the same explosion means the beginning of it. Why? Using Hubble Inflation theory the universe is growing - it’s expanding getting bigger. Like a baby the embryo doesn't fall apart it evolves and grows. Not a very good way to explain it but the truth is the truth. Our universe began when its debris passed through a weaken portal inside the dark matter element a multi-dimensional spawn of the negatively charge density. This density has a wavelength alignment which meets with material fabric outer cover it is outside this fabric surface that planetary matter exists. The portal matter passes through leaves behind it a black hole or fabric hole we find at the center of galaxies. Like all debris it has decayed - the decay coming out from the dark matter portal at the bubble surface is positive decay from negatively charged energy. This negative energy is hidden deep in the vacuum density of the bubble it resides in.  As this negatively charged decay passes through the portal as a decay it physically transforms into a high dimensional positive energy matter. Passing outside into the empty vacuum space on the other-side of the bubble this infinitely high energy matter implodes transforming its physical nature as a negative decay substance in a open vacuum with zero point energy atmosphere space cold the high energy decay emits high energy heat melting its negative component into positive component energy it implodes because its infinite energy transformation as a negative decay substance cannot withstand an endless empty vacuum density realmage. The matter transformation substance reaches infinity and collapses in on itself it transforms into a energy matter.

     In the entire universe was born. The force of pressure that followed behind the earlier matter debris that passed through the surface portal first filled an unknown outer zero point vacuum empty space space element substance with dense pressure possibly liquid pressure substance forming a expanding bubble behind the transforming matter that passed first through the portal. At first the hot matter during the transformation era grasped close to the balloon surface slowly cooling as the bubble continually grew and enlarged. At an early stage the space fabric the surface of the bubble acted repulsively towards the newly developing matter that grasp to its surface - an energy fluctuation occurred between these two entities as the fabric of the balloon surface extended a negative pushing away of the molding matter debris - causing it to spin at infinitely vast velocities shaping the matter into sphere like deities. Matter tells space where to go and space makes matter move. Vast sphere like galactic size masses formed above the bubble's surface grid. As these newly developed galactic sphere continued to cool inj the vast vacuum realm the energy from the spheres cool to an infinite state molding a frantic hot spot at the galactic century points abroad the bubble surface atmosphere - when the liquid cold vacuum atmosphere cooled the celestial matter close to infinitely cold along with the center of the sphere massive hot spot caused inside these primeval spheres to explode. This early activity of the universe's development formed a massive flatland of galaxies throughout infinite space.

    To answer the question to whether or not the big bang event was an actual event explaining the birth of the universe I would have to answer that question with where the bubble which all material planetary matter resides with in motion exist and inflating I would wonder to what degree and length of time will exist before the balloon slowly stops, the balloon explodes or the universe infinitely continues I believe weighing the evidence that the big bang hasn't happen. As mankind theoretically strives towards the future it weighs it logic by examining its past by doing so I believe what we perceive as the universe's beginning is in reality a warning to a event of the future.

    We can look at the early era universe as an event of infinitely fast interactions or events take away the sound of an explosion and you view the process of its event without the sound. Matter is pushed out of the black portal hole followed by vast pressure - pressure that even today is still expanding the universe. The matter having arrived first lies on top of an inflating bubble preceding it. At the earliest first seconds the matter is extremely boiling hot. It lies over and on top of the proceeding bubble and instantly begins to cool. Instantaneously the fabric surface of the bubble or inflating balloon begins making the cool rebidding matter instantaneously mold and spin. At the center matter cools with an in dense boiling center of mass called its hot point. It molds into independent sphere shape chunks of matter. As it cools further it’s outside shell cools as its outer shell freezes by the in dense cold empty vacuum. Cause and effect causes the gigantic galactic size spheres to explode. As part of the aftermath they become the observable galaxies we see abroad the cosmos.

      Gravity travels at the speed of light anything traveling in that constant detects no inertia or its ripples and continues traveling without constant acceleration is the burden of Albert Einstein universal speed limit and infinite mass analogy. Constant acceleration means keeping your foot on the pedal like because a car traveling is affected by friction.  Since the speed of gravity in space is constant and measures at the velocity of light our space car keeps going needs no constant acceleration which Albert Einstein believes creates the need for an infinite amount of energy energy for acceleration for its journey even to travel at speeds greater then light.

     Space expands matter proportionate to its acceleration force meaning for every ton of acceleration the driver puts to the ships pedal space adds that same amount of acceleration push with the ship.  Everything in the universe including space all operated in its beginning stages with a process forming the universe at an extreme rate of speed. A speed that as the universe evolved slowly slowed down over time but the rate of its creation measured at velocities far faster than the speed of light.  We can safely agree that when the universe was very young and slowly developing that the event and stages occurred at a vast rate of speed simply based on the manner of which the galaxies formed the planets and the stars. We can also based this strategy with the fact that what Einstein defines in physics gravity that everything developed in the process of its creation everything that exist in the universe its pressure the vacuum planetary matter ordinary matter were subject to be formed under the stress and tension of the fabric of space that the fabric of space acts as the foundation from which  everything in the universe were subject to as its repulsion pushing force we know causes planetary sphere’s to twist and function mobile is what weighs how dense the universe was from the beginning.

CBS

ON THE BLINK

BANG BANG HE SHOT ME DOWN, BANG BANG i HIT THE GROUND

DECEPTIONS IN THE SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY BY RODNEY KAWECKI PUSHING A SHIP TO TRAVEL FASTER THAN LIGHT TECHNOLOGY What is E=mq² The difference between a beam of light and mass............................ This problem in relativity is problematic...meaning having to do with equal math not mass....v has no mass at all therefore it cannot formulate with c which in this equation c equals e used for force or propulsion which is its value of course e does have mass but that doesn't mean c can't be pushed faster than c...does it? In Einstein's equations v has a limit because of e energy, which means e is limited by v - all the energy in the world can’t exceed c in relativity seems to mean no energy no matter how great cannot exceed the speed of light c/v. From the last few paragraphs you have just read lets rethink the impossibility. Relativity says e would have to have infinite mass. But from the earlier paragraphs in SPACE the vacuum in an empty field meaning away from any celestial mass astronomically far away from any celestial mass the (space)field measures zero density. Our ship in such a field also measures zero because there exist no greater density than that of the field space we are traveling through and are in. Our ship will therefore not increase in mass because the field density never changes – it is neither greater because of a planet atmosphere density nor is it less because of such change in field density. Since the gravity density of space is zero an infinite amount of e is interchangeable with the zero point density of the space field. What this means is our ship in earths 1G field density to travel close to the speed of light needs a specific amount of propulsion capacity. On earth that amount measures c. v the velocity we want to reach because space and (weight) cause by friction or gravity are interchangeable defined measurable by the density of the field which equals f and because the density of earth’s gravity field is equal to 1G, the target v/c is reached in earth’s gravity field where e is achieved. In relativity Einstein assumes that gravity is the same everywhere in the universe, that any change in the density of the field has no affect on the speed of the object. But we know that friction occurs and there exist an attraction on any object moving along the earth’s surface. We also know that what goes up also comes down. In relativity the c components of light which are the lack of mass in an ordinary object – are not affected by g which is gravity so c is the fastest anything can travel. This logic is so easy to understand yet seems not believable because of r which is relativity. In r (relativity) Einstein talks about light having zero mass yet it is not light that is traveling at v/e, it is mass and mass we know that travels through g that we measure as 1G that slows the acceleration of the moving body does so at a specific rate. We observe Newton’s laws on earth and the constant of 1G to measure 9.8 meters a second. So an object on are planet’s surface all objects fall at a specific speed. Therefore e of a mass in free fall all abort weight which is converted to mass during momentum or acceleration of the object. In space we rely on e as are common denominator when we defer the velocity of m, mass in space. Since the department of the space in the universe density is zero or 0G the stress both physical and kinetic value of e is changed from 1G on earth to 0G in space. W which is also lifted out from the equation due to e which on earth is comparable to e in space e becomes e2. In relativity E=mc². ( E?=m°c/v) E in space equals zero. M the mass of the vessel in space also equals zero. c/v are interchangeable. E (also meaning propulsion value source) on earth at 1G equals 2e ( or e + e = 2E) instead of e°. e + g = 2E. In space where the g density of the field is zero (g°) e now equals 2E. In space 2E =m° c/v. at the speed of light. 2E equals q in space equals c/v² where q because of (2E m°c²) E=mq where q in space is equal with 2E (e – g = 2E) q equals 2E v is 372,000 miles a second. E=mq (q/v) Gravity is measured by the density of the field in question if the field density is different than some other measurement G changes. At celestial planetary scaled usually based on a planet the density of the vacuum doesn’t change it is the density of the planet atmosphere its density from which its gravity measurement is equated. On earth e the energy needed to propel to light speed e of an equal force to propel against g gravity was also needed. E becomes 2E. In space where m mass equals zero is not changed by any reason effecting e (e/m) energy mass on earth which was the force of g gravity in space v the velocity of our vessel having 2E (2e=mc) the speed of the ship has the ability to travel twice the speed of light with no real changes in relativity except the extension of e. If indeed the problem of infinite mass in relativity does exist in empty space it will at E=mq square you make the choice.

DECEPTIONS IN THE SPECIAL THEORY OF RELATIVITY

PUSHING A SHIP TO TRAVEL FASTER THAN LIGHT DOES NOT AFFECT THE SHIP BEING PUSHED MASS

What is E=mq²

Rod Kawecki

The difference between a beam of light and mass............................

    This problem in relativity is problematic...meaning having to do with equal math not mass....v has no mass at all therefore it cannot formulate with c which in this equation c equals e used for force or propulsion which is its value of course e does have mass but that doesn't mean c can't be pushed faster than c...does it?  In Einstein's equations v has a limit because of e energy, which means e is limited by v - all the energy in the world can’t exceed c in relativity seems to mean no energy no matter how great cannot exceed the speed of light c/v. 

     From the last few paragraphs you have just read lets rethink the impossibility.  Relativity says e would have to have infinite mass. But from the earlier paragraphs in SPACE the vacuum in an empty field meaning away from any celestial mass astronomically far away from any celestial mass the (space)field measures zero density. Our ship in such a field also measures zero because there exist no greater density than that of the field space we are traveling through and are in. Our ship will therefore not increase in mass because the field density never changes – it is neither greater because of a planet atmosphere density nor is it less because of such change in field density. 

    Since the gravity density of space is zero an infinite amount of e is interchangeable with the zero point density of the space field. What this means is our ship in earths 1G field density to travel close to the speed of light needs a specific amount of propulsion capacity. On earth that amount measures c. v the velocity we want to reach because space and (weight) cause by friction or gravity are interchangeable defined measurable by the density of the field which equals f and because the density of earth’s gravity field is equal to 1G, the target v/c is reached in earth’s gravity field where e is achieved.  In relativity Einstein assumes that gravity is the same everywhere in the universe, that any change in the density of the field has no affect on the speed of the object. But we know that friction occurs and there exist an attraction on any object moving along the earth’s surface. We also know that what goes up also comes down. In relativity the c components of light which are the lack of mass in an ordinary object – are not affected by g which is gravity so c is the fastest anything can travel. 

     This logic is so easy to understand yet seems not believable because of r which is relativity. In r (relativity) Einstein talks about light having zero mass yet it is not light that is traveling at v/e, it is mass and mass we know that travels through g that we measure as 1G that slows the acceleration of  the moving body does so at a specific rate.  We observe Newton’s laws on earth and the constant of 1G to measure 9.8 meters a second. So an object on are planet’s surface all objects fall at a specific speed. Therefore e of a mass in free fall all abort weight which is converted to mass during momentum or acceleration of the object. 

    In space we rely on e as are common denominator when we defer the velocity of m, mass in space. Since the department of the space in the universe density is zero or 0G the stress both physical and kinetic value of e is changed from 1G on earth to 0G in space. W which is also lifted out from the equation due to e which on earth is comparable to e in space e becomes e2. In relativity E=mc². ( E?=m°c/v)

     E in space equals zero. M the mass of the vessel in space also equals zero. c/v are interchangeable. 

     E (also meaning propulsion value source) on earth at 1G equals 2e ( or e + e = 2E) instead of e°. e + g = 2E.  In space where the g density of the field is zero (g°) e now equals 2E. In space 2E =m° c/v. at the speed of light. 2E equals q in space equals c/v² where q because of (2E m°c²) E=mq where q in space is equal with 2E (e – g = 2E) q equals 2E   v is 372,000 miles a second. 

    E=mq  (q/v)

    Gravity is measured by the density of the field in question if the field density is different than some other measurement G changes. At celestial planetary scaled usually based on a planet the density of the vacuum doesn't change it is the density of the planet atmosphere its density from which its gravity measurement is equated. 

    On earth e the energy needed to propel to light speed e of an equal force to propel against g gravity was also needed. E becomes 2E.  In space where m mass equals zero is not changed by any reason effecting e (e/m) energy mass on earth which was the force of g gravity in space v the velocity of our vessel having 2E (2e=mc) the speed of the ship has the ability to travel twice the speed of light with no real changes in relativity except the extension of e.  If indeed the problem of infinite mass in relativity does exist in empty space it will at E=mq square you make the choice.

Einstein Gravity Street

Can't break the barrier

“There exists no line of appointment that says that a piece of matter, a mass or even a particle cannot be pushed to travel faster than the speed of light”.

   As a whole the physical chemistry of the objects mass in space is measured by its energy not its material fiber. If the environment density acting on the mass is equal to zero the masses energy is equal to zero. Since there is no energy interacting on the mass the product of c is equal to e. And since there is no kinetic value the objects mass is zero it is the potential of e propulsion that forms empty motion in weightless space. Where c² might be limited using c² in relativity in Quanta Physics e is not in both relativity and quanta physics theory.

 Petal to the metal: Constant acceleration equals zero traveling in weightless, energy less space equilibrium. (infinite mass also equals zero) 0-1.

    Energy that moves along with an object (that is, all the energy which is present in the object's rest frame) contributes to the total mass of the body, which measures how much it resists acceleration. Each potential and kinetic energy makes a proportional contribution to the mass even if a box of ideal mirrors "contains" light, then the individually massless photons still contribute to the total mass of the box, by the amount of their energy divided by c².

e=c²   3,459,600,000 sq.   Speed of light squared units....that's real fast Einstein?